GERLACHE STRAIT, Antarctica—The steel gray sea mirrored the overcast sky as Heidi Ahonen buckled her life jacket over her red waterproof coat. In just a few minutes she would jet out on a small inflatable zodiac boat in search of an underwater recording device she hoped to retrieve from more than 1,000 feet below the water’s surface.
She had waited nearly a year for this moment. Thankfully the weather was cooperating, she thought. Too much wind or wave action in the strait could have jeopardized her mission on this mid-January morning.
Still, she said, “I’m nervous,” as she prepared to board the zodiac from the tender pit of the MS Roald Amundsen, an 11-deck hybrid-powered cruise ship named after the Norwegian explorer who became the first person to cross Antarctica and reach the South Pole.
“What if the recorder flooded, or its batteries died?” said Ahonen, a research scientist from Finland who specializes in bioacoustics, a scientific field that examines animal behavior by the sounds they make. It had been 10 months since the device was released into the Gerlache Strait, a 120-mile-long waterway in the Southern Ocean—also known as the Antarctic Ocean—that separates a group of islands known as the Palmer Archipelago from the northwest coast of the Antarctic Peninsula.
Theoretically, she knew, it should have stayed close to where it was originally sunk along with a 50-pound weight attached to a mooring line near to where the ship now idled, deep enough to avoid getting snagged on icebergs. But it wasn’t out of the question that strong currents could have forced it to drift. What if she couldn’t find it?
It was her first time leading a project in Antarctica and she felt pressure to succeed.
“Relax,” said her partner, Andrew Lowther, a marine mammal ecologist from Australia who’s conducted field research in Antarctica for more than a decade. “We’ll either find it or we won’t.”
Uncertainty was a given working in one of the most extreme environments on Earth.
Last year, Ahonen launched a project through the Norwegian Polar Institute based in Tromsø, Norway, where she’s a senior researcher, to monitor the year-round presence of baleen whales in the strait that feed on reddish shrimp-like crustaceans called krill. There are 15 species of baleen whales, including the humpback, fin and the Antarctic minke whale that use comb-like plates of baleen instead of teeth to filter tiny prey out of the water. Some can eat more than 3,000 pounds of krill in a day.
“We’re still using monitoring techniques from 1982 to try and solve a 2025 problem.” — Andrew Lowther, Norwegian Polar InstituteBut, voluntary measures are not sufficient, said Lowther, who keeps a trimmed salt and pepper beard and mustache and has long brown hair he pulls back into a ponytail most days. Since 2014, he’s been actively involved in CCAMLR discussions on krill fishing, pushing for the organization to update their fisheries management strategy and environmental monitoring mechanisms to take into account both climate change and whales, which he said they have not done to date. “We’re still using monitoring techniques from 1982 to try and solve a 2025 problem,” he said.“People need to have confidence that the monitoring system in place is capable of detecting changes.” When the commission first established a mechanism to track how fishing and other environmental variables were impacting wildlife in Antarctica in the 1980s, CCAMLR hadn’t considered whales. There were hardly any left. After almost a century of being hunted and harvested commercially for their oil, whales had been nearly driven to extinction. In recent decades, however, some species like humpbacks have experienced remarkable resurgences since the International Whaling Commission banned commercial hunting of the animals in 1986. Some of these whales travel more than 6,000 miles from their warmer breeding and calving grounds along the west coast of South America or the Great Barrier Reef in Australia to feed on Antarctic krill each year. Now, as whales re-establish themselves as the largest air-breathing krill predators in the region, Ahonen and Lowther both say it’s essential to monitor their populations and obtain concrete data that can offer a better understanding of how the cetaceans’ renewed presence is affecting the overall ecosystem and if they are competing with the fishing industry for food.
“I’ve always been interested in how animals communicate.” — Heidi Ahonen, Norwegian Polar InstituteAs part of her previous research, for instance, at the Norwegian Polar Institute, which conducts scientific research and environmental monitoring in the Arctic and Antarctica, Ahonen had investigated the impact of underwater noise from shipping traffic and oil and gas exploration on marine mammals like narwhals in the Fram Strait, a passage in the Arctic Ocean, which runs between Greenland and Svalbard, Norway. “These guys are my favorites,” she told a group of guests listening to her lecture on bioacoustics aboard the MS Roald Amundsen as she played them an audio clip of the long single-tusked cetaceans’ squeaks and clicks they make to detect their prey using echolocation. Natural phenomena can also be studied using this method to record wind, waves, rain and ice, one of the most dominant noises in polar soundscapes, she said. Ice sizzles and pops when it melts on land. And in the ocean, sea ice creaks and groans as it expands and contracts. Thunderous booms erupt when icebergs collide. Ahonen reminded the guests that just the day before, some of them might have heard a glacier calving before they saw it.